Rootly ships with a Default Retrospective Process that runs on any incident not matched by a custom process. New workspaces can rely on it out of the box.
In This Section
Retrospective Workflows
Trigger retrospective creation, reminders, and document generation automatically.
Configuring Processes
Create, condition, and reorder processes under Configuration → Retrospectives.
Configuring Process Steps
Step attributes, phases with Custom Statuses, and reminder configuration.
Configuring Templates
Reusable document structures — plain sections, Liquid variables, AI blocks, and the AI Starter Templates gallery.
Rootly AI in Retrospectives
Auto-draft Summary, Impact, Root Cause, Mitigation, Resolution, and Timeline sections with Rootly AI.
Draft Retrospectives with Rootly AI
The heaviest lift in most retrospectives is the writing itself. Rootly AI in Retrospectives takes on the blank-page problem: sections like Summary, Impact, Root Cause, Mitigation, Resolution, and Curated Timeline get drafted automatically from the incident’s data, Slack channel, and bridge-call transcripts. Owners edit, regenerate, or convert to plain text — nothing is frozen.How It Works, Briefly
A retrospective process is a named, ordered set of steps Rootly creates on an incident after resolution. When an incident is created or updated, Rootly evaluates the conditions on each process, picks the one that matches, and creates the process on the incident. Retrospectives can be mandatory, auto-skipped, or optional based on incident context — configured separately from the process itself under Retrospectives → Preferences. For the full picture, see configuring processes for routing and preferences, configuring process steps for step attributes and phases, and incident variables for the retrospective variables.Best Practices
- Start with the default process. Fastest way to see the flow end-to-end. Add custom processes only when a specific severity or team needs something different.
- Add AI blocks to the template your default process uses. Even one Summary block cuts retrospective time noticeably.
- Assign by role, not by user. A step assigned to “Commander” auto-routes to whoever ran the incident. Named-user assignments go stale.
- Reserve required steps for the outputs that actually block the process from closing. Retros with too many mandatory steps get abandoned.
- Audit process conditions quarterly. Severity definitions and team boundaries drift.
Related Pages
Collaborative Retrospectives
Real-time co-authoring, comments, exports, and Liquid variables in the editor.
Retrospective Workflows
Automate retrospective creation, notifications, and external document generation.
Action Items
Follow-ups created from a retrospective — track, assign, and close them.
Incident Variables
Liquid variables for referencing the retrospective from workflows and templates.
Frequently Asked Questions
When is a retrospective created?
When is a retrospective created?
Rootly creates the retrospective when the incident is resolved. From that point,
Retrospective Created and Retrospective Updated workflow triggers fire on lifecycle events.How does Rootly decide which process to use?
How does Rootly decide which process to use?
On resolution, Rootly evaluates each process’s conditions. All matching processes are candidates; if more than one matches, the most recently created wins. If none match, the Default Retrospective Process runs. Full match logic is in configuring processes.
Can a retrospective be skipped?
Can a retrospective be skipped?
Yes — the mechanism is separate from the process. Whether a retrospective is mandatory, auto-skipped, or optional is configured under Retrospectives → Preferences with its own conditions on severity, type, or team.
What's the difference between this section and Collaborative Retrospectives?
What's the difference between this section and Collaborative Retrospectives?
Retrospective processes (this section) define when and how to run a retrospective — steps, owners, deadlines, routing. Collaborative Retrospectives is the editor experience for the retrospective document: real-time co-authoring, comments, exports, Liquid variables.
Why do I still see 'postmortem' in some places?
Why do I still see 'postmortem' in some places?
Rootly renamed Postmortem to Retrospective. Older workflows, integrations, and Liquid variables that use
postmortem_* continue to resolve — see incident variables on the Reference page.